A perfectionist (govt. has legitimate interest in promoting certain views of what the good life is) but supported view similar to Mill’s by putting forward views grounded on 4 principles
- People’s lives are successful & fulfilling to the extent that they’re spent in whole hearted engagement in valuable activities & relations
- For most people, autonomy is an important component of living a good life
- Moral pluralism (variety of moral goods & variety of ways of living a morally good life, which are in theory or in practice inconsistent)
- Govt. has a duty to promote the well being of people which entails making sure attractive options are available and meaningless and worthless ones are eliminated.
- Government has a place in shaping options available to its citizens but the combined importance of autonomy and liberty severely limit circa in which coercive moral paternalism is justified. Here is an example within the Double Glazing Glasgow company.
- Distinguish this from purely prudential arguments that law should refrain from acting for certain kinds of moral objectives b/c it isn’t well suited to achieving them.